Re: [ Creed Discuss ] NCR: it's about music

From: "Kimberly Reid" <kimbereid@msn.com>
To: <creed-discuss@debbir.com>
Date: Wed
06 Nov 2002 17:37:53 +0000

That is an excellent speech!  Good points.

 
----Original Message Follows----
From: KJRHO@aol.com
Hey everybody, since we had a discussion about downloading music. I wanted
u'll to read my speech for study skills and tell me what you think. Thanks,
Kat

Have you ever heard the old story of the farmer who went to church

alone one Sunday, because his wife was sick? Well, she wanted to know what
the sermon was about so she asked him,
"What did the preacher talk about?"
"Sin."
"Well, what he say about it?"
"He was against it."
Most people would agree that they are against stealing, just like they
are against sinning. But what separates people is their definition of
stealing -- because music can be downloaded free off the internet, is it
stealing to do this? I believe this is stealing for these reasons--it is a
violation of copyright laws; it is a theft of the composer's creativity; and
it deprives the artist of royalties that are due him and therefore increases
the price of CD's.
The first reason I consider downloading music as stealing is that most
artists have copyrighted their works to protect the musician and his artistic
effort. Copyright law is defined by www.dictionary.com as "the legal right
granted to an author, composer, playwright, publisher, or distributor to
exclusive publication, production, sale, or distribution of a literary,
musical, dramatic, or artistic work." This means the music cannot be
downloaded unless there is written permission from the composer. Therefore,
when someone downloads an MP3, he or she is violating musical artist's legal
rights. But if one buys the CD, he has permission from the artist to play
and listen to the music.
The next reason I consider downloading music as stealing, is that this
habit takes a service or product from an artist without paying for it.
Robbery of a famous artist's painting would be stealing. Copying a
well-known song is the same as stealing a popular painting--you have taken
part of the artist's creativity without paying for it. No matter how you
slice it, these two activities amount to stealing.
Finally, the illegal copying of music makes CD prices higher for those
customers who actually buy the CD. Because the artist has lost out on
revenues of lost sales, he must raise the price of his CD's in order to make
a living. Therefore, the honest, ethical music lover ends up being hit in
the pocketbook because of unauthorized copies of the CD.
Some of the people who illegally download and burn CD's will try to
justify their position by saying "everyone does it." However, we know that
this is not an acceptable practice and that frequency of occurrence does not
excuse or forgive a sin. In conclusion, the downloading of music from the
internet is wrong. It is the willful breaking of copyright laws, it is the
theft of creative energy, and it has negative economic impact upon the
musician as well as the legal music customer. Sin is sin. Stealing is
stealing.


MSN 8 helps ELIMINATE E-MAIL VIRUSES. Get 2 months FREE*. To unsubscribe or change your preferences for the Creed-Discuss list, visit: http://www.debbir.com/lists/Creed-discuss.htm To submit your profile, visit: http://www.creedlisters.com/profile/submit.asp To view List member Profiles, visit: http://www.creedlisters.com